Is the USPS Going Out of Business?

Imagine a business losing $1B a month. Its brand name is well known by consumers, but associated with bureaucratic inertia and occasional acts of workplace homicide. Management has a scheme to massively cut costs andUSPS Stamp modestly raise prices that, with luck, may return the company to break even five years from now.

Would you like to own a share of this outfit? Too late. You already do.

The inevitable, if not imminent, demise of the US Postal Service is one of the recurring themes here at BMA. Aside from affording me the opportunity to poke fun at Washington, and make predictions that are safely in far off in the future, I keep returning to the topic because it is an example of one of the core ideas of this blog, that vague and wishful thinking is no match for the reality of dollars and cents.

The Post Office is in serious trouble. If it were a normal corporation with private creditors it would almost certainly be in Chapter 11 by now. Deficits are large and getting larger. The top line is shrinking quickly.

Mail volumes are down 23% since 2007. And that decline is part of a long term trend, not some short-term effect of the Great Recession. Overall volumes peaked in 2006, but first class mail, which is is the real money maker for the USPS, peaked in 1999.

Moreover, it is a monopoly. These are not revenues lost to a competitor that they might someday win back. People have just reduced their usage of mail. It does not take much insight to see that technology is gradually, inexorably, eating away at this business.

The horrible truth is that there are very few applications for snail mail for which an electronic alternative would not be cheaper and faster. That most of us still use it as much as we do is driven more by laziness than a rational preference. As time goes on, we will all get around to using the USPS less. A lot less.

Recently, the Post Office backed down from a scheme to close 3,700 of its 36,500 locations. That would have saved $200M a year, implying that each to-be-closed office loses about $56K a year. The new plan is to significantly reduce the hours at 13,000 offices, which will save $500M a year. (Part-time offices mean part-time workers, and they do not get such expensive benefits.)

That sounds like a big step in the right direction until you remember that the USPS is losing $36M a day, so this will close the gap for just under two weeks out of the year. What about the rest of the red ink? Well, they have a plan.

Released in February, the five year “Plan to Profitability” lays out $20B in annual savings, of which about half will require legislative action. At first blush, it all seems plausible. Then doubt sets in.

Part of the savings turns out to be “revenue management” that is, raising rates, which seems to be based on the very optimistic idea that fist class volume is not affected by changes in price. They project a 14% decline in volume over the next five years (which would be a meaningful improvement over the past five years) but only a 7% decline in revenue.

And the single largest contributor to the $20B in annual savings is $7B on healthcare. To put that in perspective, there are currently 557,000 employees, so that is a savings of about $12,500 per employee per year. Of course, it is not current employees but retired ones that cost the real money. And here is the biggest slight of hand in the plan.

A few years back, Congress got this crazy idea that the USPS should “pre-fund” its future retiree healthcare obligations. In other words, instead of trusting that in decades to come they will be able to pay for retirees healthcare out of current revenues, they should set aside money now to match the liability. Turns out, that is a lot of money to set aside, more than $5B a year.

The Plan to Profitability fixes this by zeroing out the $5B line item. The unstated implication being that should the USPS someday be unable to cover healthcare costs for its retirees the Federal Government will.

The plan also includes drastically reducing the workforce by attrition (more than half of current employees are eligible for retirement) closing locations, and ending Saturday delivery. All things that an autonomous organization that could make its own decisions would have done years ago.

What is remarkable about all this is not that the USPS is in trouble. That is the natural order of things, the unstoppable march of capitalism’s creative destruction at work.

What is weird is how little anybody seems to notice. At 557,000 employees and 36,500 retail locations, the USPS is nothing short of gigantic. Just about every American uses its services. What would the media buzz be like if McDonald’s (420,000 employees, 33,500 locations world-wide) was in similarly dire straits? And remember GM’s (209,000 employees) bankruptcy and bailout?

The crisis at the USPS flies under the radar partly because of its twilight status, neither an independent corporation with shareholders and creditors, nor a government agency that appears in the Federal budget. But in a larger sense, the problems at the Post Office do not enter our consciousness because we all have a vague feeling that the PO has always been there and so always will.

The numbers just do not work. Wishful thinking aside, it is hard to see the USPS surviving in recognizable form without ten or even eleven digit annual subsidies from the Federal government, and it is not clear to me that Congress would go along with that. I would not.


  • By Steve, May 11, 2012 @ 3:57 pm

    The government mandates prices, costs, and profitability. They can only pick two of the three. The only thing the government could do to ensure all three is to mandate that we all mail at least N first-class pieces of mail every month.

  • By Jason, May 11, 2012 @ 4:37 pm

    In the War on Math, Math is a brutal opponent.

  • By Neil, May 11, 2012 @ 9:12 pm

    Whenever I hear about trouble at USPS, I’m always struck by how it compares to similar services in other countries. I’m particularly familiar with Canada Post, which consistently makes money and pays a dividend to Canadian taxpayers, 2011 being an exception due to a 2 month strike.

    I also know that Canadians who live near the border will cross just to mail a package, because US mail is so much cheaper.

    I suspect that the big difference is the extent of government control. CP is given a mandate by the government to provide mail service to every community in Canada, priced to be self-funding. Then it’s hands off and let management decide how to do it. USPS seems to be hamstrung by congress, unable to raise prices, close offices, or change anything else about their business without it being approved by at least half of the 535 most short-sighted people in America.

    So they’re left with too many locations, an inability to contract out to leverage the flexibility of the private sector, and, apparently, to wean themselves off lettermail. In most of the world “first class” isn’t the money maker…bulk ad-mail and parcels are.

  • By David, May 21, 2012 @ 12:54 am

    Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006.

    It requires them to drop ridiculous amounts of money to pre-fund retiree benefits. Without this the USPS would have actually turned a slight over the past 5 years… Congress destroyed their budget, it has nothing to do with the relevancy of mail or their efficiency.

  • By jim, June 22, 2012 @ 3:17 pm

    Prefunding retiree benefits is a giant reason the USPS has financial problems. They are the ONLY organization required to do that. Its a stupid and unfair requirement to single out USPS to do.

    How about we mandate that all private companies and government bodies prefund their pension liabilities? Lets see congress pass that. e.g. I’m sure the state of Illinois can find $83 billion somewhere… right?

    The real truth is that shortfalls in retirement is the norm not the exception and USPS is being treated entirely different than everyone else. Everyone else just ignores the problem and kicks the liability down the road, yet congress mandates an entirely impractical quick fix for the USPS shortfall.

  • By Frank Curmudgeon, June 27, 2012 @ 10:04 pm


    Allowing the USPS to not fund its pension obligations is essentially agreeing that the taxpayers will pick up the very large bill when the Post Office finally goes away. And it will.

    Private sector companies do have to keep their pensions funded, although the accounting certainly can get murky. It’s really only governments that get a free pass, on the questionable premise that they will always be around to pay what’s needed.

  • By Bruce, February 26, 2013 @ 2:15 pm

    Do you know that if you send a parcel post package out, and if it is returned to to the sender (you). In order to get your package back from the post office, you must pay the postage price again for having it returned to you.

Other Links to this Post

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

WordPress Themes